Mark Twain
by Ron Chernow
1,174 pages
Penguin Press
Published: May 13, 2025
Ron Chernow’s latest, and widely-anticipated, biography of “Mark Twain” has just been released. Among his seven previous books are biographies of Alexander Hamilton, Ulysses S. Grant, John D. Rockefeller, Sr., and the Pulitzer Prize-winning biography “Washington: A Life.”
Until now, readers enchanted by Mark Twain’s folksy, irreverent charm generally relied on Justin Kaplan’s 1966 Pulitzer Prize-winner “Mr. Clemens and Mark Twain” (which I’ve not read) or Ron Powers’s more modern “Mark Twain: A Life” (which I have). Chernow’s biography, arriving two decades after Powers’s book, provides a compelling third option. But it is one that many readers will find intimidating, with a narrative that stretches a daunting (and sometimes exhausting) 1,033 pages.
Given the depth of research he conducted during the seven-plus years he worked on this biography, Chernow skillfully tracks Twain’s flurry of impulses, observations, career professions and personal relationships in significantly more detail than has been attempted before. And to a far greater extent than in his earlier biographies, Chernow allows his subject’s own words to permeate this book, adding a valuable first-person element to the narrative.
Chernow approaches Twain not as the iconic “father of American literature” (as appraised by William Faulkner) but as a flawed human with a complicated relationship between his public and private personas. The Twain featured in this encyclopedic work produced some of America’s most keen, thought-provoking, enduring and often light-hearted literature, aphorisms and witticisms…yet proves a surprisingly tragic figure.
More than half of the book’s text is devoted to chronicling Twain’s perennial lack of business judgment, contradictions in his attitude toward race and religion, his family’s chronic health problems, his creepy (but apparently chaste) fascination with young girls and his pathologic need to harbor and redeem grudges.
To his credit, Chernow does not attempt to distill Twain’s behavior into a simple thesis and, instead, embraces his complexity. In sixty-nine chapters, with a no-stone-left-unturned approach to documenting Twain’s life, Chernow assiduously but unevenly details his subject’s whirlwind of thoughts, aspirations, fascinations, insecurities, failures, foibles, accomplishments and, it seems, every journey he took anywhere.
Readers familiar with Chernow’s previous biographies will approach this book with high expectations. But this biography differs from his previous works both in terms of length (it surpasses even the weighty “Grant”) and, more importantly, in terms of narrative style and pace.
Chernow’s biography of Washington, for example, sweeps its readers almost effortlessly through an eight-hundred-page narrative which is part history, part scene-setting and part bird’s-eye-view of Washington’s life. “Mark Twain,” in contrast, presents readers with a lengthier, more dense, and much less lyrical literary journey. Twain seems no less interesting than Chernow’s previous biographical subjects, but the mustached maven somehow eludes this author’s attempt to capture his essence with the same degree of efficiency and eloquence.
The most interesting parts of Twain’s life are arguably his childhood and early adult years. But while this three-decade slice of his life is incredibly well-told and extraordinarily engaging, it accounts for less than one-fifth of the book. Just a few chapters further, the reader finds a fifty-year old Twain who is now past the peak of his personal and professional successes…and yet nearly 700 pages of text remain.
By this point, the book’s pace has slowed considerably – sometimes tediously – and the narrative primarily stands guard over the persistent, slow-motion implosion of Twain’s world with a level of granularity that often seems unnecessary.
A minor burglary at Twain’s residence – an apparent triviality – takes up nearly the same space as a discussion of the composition of “The Adventures of Tom Sawyer.” And the attention paid to Twain’s disagreement with his housekeeper is afforded treatment roughly equal to that of his four-year career as a Mississippi River steamboat apprentice and pilot.
Despite its hefty size and thorough perspective, however, Chernow’s biography offers almost no new revelations into his subject’s life. One notable exception is Twain’s interest in his “Angelfish” – a group of young girls he befriended and to whom he wrote more than 300 oddly affectionate letters, provided trinkets and occasionally around him during his later years. Chernow uncomfortably observes that nothing inappropriate has ever been alleged, and yet…
Finally, Chernow possesses a well-deserved reputation for composing fabulously fluent prose and crafting narratives so engrossing that his books scream to be read in one sitting. But while this biography of Mark Twain does much more than hint at Chernow’s literary aptitude, it does not provide the same vibrance, fluidity or literary “joie de vivre” as his previous biographies.
Overall, Ron Chernow’s “Mark Twain” is a magisterial, attentive, penetrating and sober exploration of a remarkable American personality whose public-facing humor and wit stood in contrast to an often troubled personal life. Readers blessed with time and fortitude will uncover numerous gems among these thousand-plus pages. But those expecting to find Chernow at his best – with a consistently engaging, brilliantly-hued and evenly-paced narrative – may be disappointed.
Overall rating: 4 stars
Hi Steve – thanks for doing this review as I had heard about this new Chernow release and was debating a purchase – this helped a lot!
Suggest to get from your library.
Thanks for the review! I’m tackling this monster on audio this summer so I’ll buckle in for a long ride.
Thanks for the review. I have been debating reading this, as I have no strong interest in Mark Twain, but have read (and enjoyed) all of Chernow’s prior books other than the essay collection. I would be reading the book for Chernow and not for Twain. Your review is consistent with what I have read elsewhere. I am in no rush to read this one.
Separately, does this review mean you are back to writing more frequent book reviews?
Five”ish” years ago I read Powers’s bio of Twain partly in response to having seen his interactions with Ulysses Grant (via Chernow’s bio, among others) while encouraging him to write, and then promoting, Grant’s memoirs. I concluded that Twain was an incredibly interesting fellow who probably wasn’t fully captured by Powers, so I was fascinated when I heard Chernow was working on him. In the end, Twain may be one of those folks who creates (or has created) an image which is far larger than his “real life” so the better you get to know him, the less brightly his image shines.
Separately, I’ve now spent much of the past year on “side” pursuits and have been looking to this Twain release as a catalyst for steering my ship back toward biographies. I don’t think I’ll quite get back to the pace I sustained from 2012-2020, but I do plan to refocuse some of my energy in that direction…
Thank you for the review, Steve, dismayed as I am by the findings. If you haven’t read the review in the NYT you’ll be pleased that you’ve noticed and clearly explained the same flaws in the lopsided approach to Twain’s first 30 years as their (paid) reviewer did.
And to be honest, with the recent publishing of the large 3 volumes of Twain’s autobiography, I’m disappointed that Mr. Chernow didn’t chose someone less well-known and picked over. He’s done the other Gilded Age tycoons – imagine a warts and all tome on Henry Ford, for instance?
Thanks for the note – one of the first things I often do after writing a review, particularly of a new release, is to see where the conventional reviews landed. I do my best to avoid seeing those before I’ve read the book as I don’t want to start a new bio with preconceived notions of what I’m going to find. But I was fascinated to read the NYT review yesterday which was surprisingly critical of the book (and was quite eloquent in its criticism). Most of the other reviews I saw were mildly to undeservedly generous, in my opinion. Overall, I was expecting another Chernow “masterpiece” and I think he simply tackled a subject who proved so complex, chaotic and ultimately tragic, that his usual modus operandi didn’t work quite the same way. But I commend him for the attempt, and wish he had the time and inclination to try the same for Ben Franklin and countless others (including several former presidents). Henry Ford, Andrew Carnegie, Vanderbilt and so many others could also use his “touch”!
largely over written and banal prose misses the mark unless boredom is the goal.